It’s happening again!

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The DMA should never have allowed Apple any oversight of apps distributed outside their store.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think this is distributed outside their store, flashlight man.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Epic was planning to distribute it in its own store in the EU.

        flashlight man.

        I’ll take it.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You’re smart enough to know this is nothing like that because you are old enough to have played UT

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Doesn’t change that I wish people cared more about when companies shutdown games that they paid for. It cost Epic pennies to keep the master servers running.

  • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Didn’t they just have a court thing saying its illegal for apple to do so?

  • Tracaine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That title sounds redundant. “Apple banned fortnite. People are reporting that it’s banned.”

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I surmised that people are more than just reporting the ban. They seem to be highlighting the unfair hand of Apple preventing them from doing what they want on their device

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    So they’re wilfully ignoring the EU’s Digital Markets Act and a US court-ordered injunction that prevents them from punishing developers for trying to circumvent the use of the App Store for in-app purchases, after one of their execs was caught lying under oath and potentially facing criminal repercussions.

    I’m not the biggest fan of Epic Games, but I really want to see this backfire spectacularly. Apple’s business practices are so bad that it makes me want to see Tim Sweeney kick Tim Cook’s ass in court.

    • SomeSphinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I can’t believe I’m cheering for Sweeney even once, but I guess it works out for all of us in this case.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I personally always root for the underdog when I have no stake. I thank epic for the free games I play on my steam deck, used to have an iPhone but transitioned to a Linux phone fairly early, and not a fan of either company’s current director.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    People buying Apple products want to be told by Apple what’s allowed. The walled garden is core to Apple’s product philosophy. It’s not like everybody was expecting Apple to be super open and inclusive with anything and then be taken by surprise from the Fortnite situation. Even before they deprecated open standards because their own tech is supposedly evolving faster and are better integrated.

    People wanting to play Fortnite on phones can just get a reasonably specced Android phone and install EGS next to Play Store with just a few taps.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      People buying Apple products want to be told by Apple what’s allowed.

      I get that this crowd generally thinks Apple is hellspawn, in spite of also having devices made by other, also shitty corporations, but this is just a dumb thing to say. They’re just devices. Yes some of us prefer them. I didn’t switch after every mainline Android phone from G1 through Nexus and Pixel because I wanted a paternal imposition of allowed apps. Stupid fucking comment.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, apple is a piece of shit for not allowing you to flash whatever firmware you want on there. It makes my job harder and no one wants to do ios pentesting because of that.

        I hope that apple burns to hell.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t disagree with any of that. I only take issue with the quoted statement.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Stupid fucking comment.

        I was merely stating in simple words what Apple’s product is and that their customers respond to exactly that. You choice of words shows that a loud fraction of their user base is a cult, though.

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          What are you on about? What you said simply is not true. At least, I’ve not once heard an Apple user state they wanted to be told what they were allowed to use. You either believe that, which would be stupid, or you don’t which would be disingenuous. You pick.

          It may be a scumbag company, or its users a cult, but that doesn’t stop what you said from being stupid.

          • Alaik@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve yet to hear anyone in republican cities say they want a king, yet they keep on voting for it.

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, not really. I buy Apple because I’ve had 3 Android phones crap out on me literally days after their warranty died. I got tired of that shit, I paid a bit more and got myself an iPhone 13. It still works as good as it did on the first day. While I do know that Apple devices have a set death day (when they stop getting security updates), I believe I generate far less e-waste by buying 1 iPhone every 7 or 8 years instead of buying a brand new Android every year.

      As far as Fortnite goes, I don’t care for the game itself, but I am happy that they fought Apple in court and gave developers the freedom to implement third party IAP, albeit I have no use for it as I only use my phone for phone calls and messaging and the occasional web browsing.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        What a disingenuous arguement.

        You said you paid more for an iPhone, which means you were buying cheap Android phones and then complaining that they don’t last. Well yeah, because they’re cheap.

        You can buy Android phones that make iPhones look like the budget option if you want to, I’m not advising it but it’s possible.

        • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’d say even cheap Androids can last long: Samsung A series receive 4 OS updates and after updates are over, you can get a few more years with last supported OS until battery or app compatibility becomes a problem.

        • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was one S21, S22 and a Pixel 5 or 6. I didn’t overpay for the mux delux version, just the basic one.

      • bork@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        buying a brand new android every year

        We’ve had wildly different experiences with these companies, for what it’s worth.

        I bought an iPhone X back when they were new, and had to get it replaced twice within the first 6 months because of hardware failures.

        Conversely, I kept my Pixel 3 (from 2019) until last year.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s how stuff works. Different people have different experiences. I had to get my pixel 3 replaced twice under warranty for a known screen issue. The pixel 7a, believe it is, is currently in the middle of a mass battery failure issue that really should end in a recall, where they’re refunding people often more than they even paid for the phone when it happens. Every flagship pixel up until the 5 had major hardware issues.

          iPhones have, historically, been the best phones you could get in terms of being built to last, which is also why Apple have such long software support for them.

        • _____@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Predicting a classic tale of comparing apple flagships to $150 android phones.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had a MacBook, while I was typing on it, suddenly just turn off, never to be turned on again. Took it to the store, they told me it was cheaper to buy a new one.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I only use my phone for phone calls and messaging and the occasional web browsing.

        Why not use a feature phone, then? Cheaper, more repairable, and the Nokia ones will also last longer.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Android is an operating system. It has nothing to do with crappy hardware. At least they’re somewhat repairable when they do break.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    They targeted gamers.

    Gamers.

    We’re a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.

    We’ll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it’s fun.

    We’ll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.

    Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.

    Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?

    These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We’re already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren’t shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We’ve been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that’s already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they’ve threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can’t is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.

    Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You’re not special, you’re not original, you’re not the first; this is just another boss fight.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Gonna disagree there, gamers can’t give up pre-ordering games through studios that regularly bait and switch and throwing money at the biggest AAA studios.

    • Estradiol Enjoyer @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you don’t want to be called racist misogynist rape apologists don’t be racist, misogynist, or apologize for rape. Pretty simple. Gamers are not actually an oppressed identity my guy. Nobody is out to get you.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t know whether you’ve been alive during the “games make people violent” craze, where the establishment was trying to pin school shootings on a harmless hobby: The same establishment which caused the systemic issues driving youth into desperation was now blaming an escapist hobby for the issues they, themselves, caused. It’s like framing jugglers for knife attacks. Do some jugglers juggle knives? Yes. Does that have anything to do with anything? No.

        Is that in any way comparable in scale and intensity to what various groups had to go through historically, or are now, no of course not. But gamers, as a wider culture, know what it’s like to be victim-blamed. The average person who picks up playing games as a hobby is not any more racist, misogynist, or drivelling rape apologia than the population average. They do it because they enjoy it, no further qualifications necessary.

        But OTOH, nope. The copypasta is pumped-up to 11 when it comes to the capacity of gamers to be a community, to organise, take joint action, be a force, everything. I’d be easy to go “no true gamer” on some people but face it “gamers” as a group are still pre-ordering games and letting GPU scalpers have their way with us. Just as powerless as, say, football fans are powerless in he face of FIFA corruption. Concert goes in the face of ticket platform monopolies. We’re a hopeless case in any other aspect but whinging: That, we are masters of.

    • brrk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is this a copy pasta? If it weren’t for the 1 typo (8n), I’d swear this is a copy pasta. If it’s not already, I’m definitely saving it and making it one. Nice pasta, bro

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Keep it up Apple, keep pissing off the gamers. Shrink that monopoly. Seems pretty fucking insane that they can stop an app from working remotely. If an app that is being used to coordinate a rebellion takes off the US government can order Apple to disable its use. I hope the degoogling Android trend takes off further.

    • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      They targeted gamers.

      Gamers.

      We’re a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.

      We’ll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it’s fun.

      We’ll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.

      Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.

      Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?

      These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We’re already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren’t shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We’ve been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that’s already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they’ve threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can’t is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.

      Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You’re not special, you’re not original, you’re not the first; this is just another boss fight.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you’re trying to organise a rebellion via any privately owned company, you’re a fucking idiot.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imagine if now, at the height of their success, Apple finally decided, for the first time, to alienate the core audience they’ve always shown undying dedication to: gamers /s

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah keep pissing off gamers. The pro consumer group that got lootboxes, battlepasses, denuvo, endless copy pastes and lazy remakes, nintendo and sony practises, shameless pay to win, day 1 on disk dlc, anti cheat that just blocks only linux users, not cheaters, kernel level anti cheat, ea and ubisoft clients on steam games and pay to win mechanics on already full priced games popular and successful.

      Apple is NOT ready for the way gamers are going to make this practise normalized and profitable.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a gamer I have very low respect for other gamers ability to organise any levels of resistance to shifty business practices.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          How they actually spend their money never lies. They moan, but they still pre-order shit like gibbering apes.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Doubt I have paid full price for a AAA game in like a decade at this point. Not even many that I bought. Does shadow of mordor count? I got that at a massive discount ages after release. It was ok, but I would want my money back if I had paid full price.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s actually Epic’s fault this time. They pulled it from the EU app store.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      GaMeRs aren’t going to do shit to Apple lol. Fortnite hasn’t been on iPhones for years and Apple hasn’t been hurt one bit.

      If an app that is being used to coordinate a rebellion takes off the US government can……

      lol

    • kayazere@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      If an app that is being used to coordinate a rebellion takes off the US government can order Apple to disable its use. I hope the degoogling Android trend takes off further.

      Apple already did this in Hong Kong to appease China. They took down apps that were used by protesters to coordinate, they even modified AirDrop so it couldn’t be easily used for ad hoc communication.

      https://9to5mac.com/2025/03/17/apple-globally-censoring-this-iphone-communication-feature-deserves-renewed-scrutiny/

  • Maverick604@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    Epic is a piece of shit company. The only reason they are fighting this fight with Apple is because they want some of Apple’s platform fees for themselves. Period.

    The fact that they managed to convince a bunch of simpletons that they are somehow Robin Hood coming to free them from the tyrant (who was actually protecting all those users all along) is laughable. Apple created the platform, Apple managed it, curated it, and controlled it. That gives them the right to profit from it. You might dislike that but — guess what? Nobody forced you to buy it. Buy Android if Fortnight is so important to you. Seriously. Please. We won’t miss you.

    Epic thinks they have a right to profit from Apple’s platform and not pay them for all the work they did to get it to be over 1 billion users. That is simply wrong. They should build their own platform and their own App Store and convince 1 billion people to use it. The reason they aren’t doing that is because they know they will never be as successful as Apple has been.

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    their iPhone is preventing them from playing the game

    Epic are the ones preventing Fortnite from being available on iPhones. They have no one to blame but themselves for the way they planned to intentionally break the App Store rules and had a lawsuit ready to go when it was rightly removed from the store.

    They fucked around and found out.

    • tranceFusion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funny someone with your username would advocate for people who outright bought a piece of hardware to be controlled by the manufacturer in terms of what they can do with their device, while also forcefully taking an enormous cut of any transactions involving it.

      Epic has forced Apple to give users more options, and that’s a good thing. Epic are usually the bad guys - this time they weren’t.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Epic intentionally broke the rules of the contract they agreed to, and had a lawsuit ready to go as soon as Apple rightfully removed their game from the store over the breach of contract. Epic were not the good guys.

        You guys need to get this idea out of your head that the makers of the device that you bought need to provide ways for you to do what you want with it. They don’t, and any attempt to force them to write software to do so should be denied.

        You can do whatever the hell you like with your hardware. Take it apart, take it fishing, try and hack it, have sex with it - whatever you want! But the device makers aren’t responsible for giving you ways to hack it.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          You guys need to get this idea out of your head that the makers of the device that you bought need to provide ways for you to do what you want with it. They don’t, and any attempt to force them to write software to do so should be denied.

          You can do whatever the hell you like with your hardware. Take it apart, take it fishing, try and hack it, have sex with it - whatever you want! But the device makers aren’t responsible for giving you ways to hack it.

          You’re looking at this the wrong way.

          We do not expect Apple/Google/Samsung/etc to give us tools to do whatever we want. Hell, Google already ships adb that explicitly allows unlocking the bootloader on at least Pixel devices.

          What we do want is for companies to stop intentionally preventing it with arbitrary restrictions that amount to nothing more than “because we said so”.

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              When did I ever say I was entitled to it?

              Furthermore, why are you so eager to lick corporate boot over this? Just accept the fact that corps are fucking consumers over by trying to redefine terms like “purchase” and “own” to mean something other than their existing widely-accepted definitions.

              If I buy an expensive piece of hardware, I do expect to be able to own it and install what I goddamn well please, corporate approval be damned. That’s why I buy Pixels and standard PC hardware, because I can unlock the bootloader/disable secure boot and install what I goddamn well please. Can’t do that with any iPhone, and rarely a Mac, because it goes against what Daddy Apple hath decreed.

              Additionally, it is also acceptable to acknowledge the former and simultaneously acknowledge that Epic is a shitty company. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I was about to give a genuine reply, then I read your second sentence and now I realize there’s no point. Straight to the tired old garbage “boot licker” insults. Have fun.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have a genuine question:

      How does arguing in support of arguably bad business practices in general benefit you?

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        What are the “arguably bad business practices” here? I would argue that Epic pissing off the manufacturer of the most popular phones in the world, which have over 90% of all in-app purchase $$$$ spent in the mobile world, is bad business practice - not even arguably.

        As for anything “benefiting me”……am I not allowed an opinion or to express it unless it’s echo chamber aligned? Is it only allowed if it ignores all logic and is just mindless anger against [insert big corporation name here]?

        I’m giving context to the situation.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lol, siding with apple here is a bootlicker thing to do.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        You guys need to find a new name to call people.

        Epic were the bad guys in this scenario. Why are you licking the boot of epic?

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I wasn’t “licking big corporate boot” in the first place. I said that epic have no one but themselves to blame, which is true. I said if epic did to me what they did to Apple, I’d tell them to get fucked if they ever tried to put stuff on my store again.

            No bootlicking at all, but that doesn’t stop some losers from throwing out the term because they hate company X. Apple built a product, and they’re entitled to make it a closed ecosystem. We, as consumers, are entitled to not buy or use their products if we don’t like them, their policies, etc.

            People vote with their wallets, and unfortunately for the Apple haters, the votes keep coming up Apple no matter how many recounts there are. Android is right there as an alternative and lets you do basically whatever you want with it, yet outside of third world countries the iPhone rules the roost.

  • eleitl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you care about freedom, use open source operating systems, and only buy hardware that support it.

  • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Epic isn’t wrong about Apples payment requirements being BS, but Epic also isn’t exactly a hero here.

    Will be interesting to see how this pissing match plays out over time.

    Should you be able to use other payment providers outside of apple pay YES!

    Should you be able to install other APP stores on an iPhone? Not sure.

    • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why shouldn’t you be able to install whatever you want? Maybe I’m missing something…

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am in the camp that there is a benefit to the managed store. Since moving family members to iOS devices the number of times they have loaded malware or asked me for help installing ANYTHING dropped to zero.

        Should techies be able to side load if they want? Sure, should that be a primary install method? No.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          There is a benefit. And you can continue using the first-party store if you want. There’s no benefit to not being able to use 3rd-party ones to anyone but Apple and their investors.

        • FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          All bootloaders should be able to be unlocked and able to install the OS of your choice. Also you should be able to choose whatever app store you want. It is your hardware, you payed for it.

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            If you want a customizable phone, yes. If you want a secured phone, no.

            There are already existing products for both sides. No point in forcing them to do something else at this point.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Except Google is trying to limit this on Android phones as well (e.g. with SafetyNet).

              If manufacturers had their way, there wouldn’t be any phones for one side.

              • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I mean that’s something that’d happen regardless of whether you may install other App Stores on an iPhone easily, no?

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  GP wrote:

                  All bootloaders should be able to be unlocked and able to install the OS of your choice. Also you should be able to choose whatever app store you want. It is your hardware, you payed for it.

                  App stores are just one part of the puzzle. Unless consumers actually have rights, manufacturers will keep trying to limit their options.

              • Zak@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                If manufacturers had their way, there wouldn’t be any phones for one side.

                There’s nothing stopping manufacturers from permanently locking the bootloader. Some do and others don’t suggesting that the industry does not have a universal preference.

                I do think Google wants it to be inconvenient enough to run a version of Android they haven’t blessed as one’s main phone that it has no chance to become mainstream, but that’s about the prospect of an OEM not bundling Google’s apps and store, not hobbyists running custom builds. If that sounds like an attempt to use market power to exclude competitors in violation of fair trading laws in a multitude of jurisdictions, you might be on to something.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  There’s nothing stopping manufacturers from permanently locking the bootloader. Some do and others don’t suggesting that the industry does not have a universal preference.

                  Some manufacturers have stopped allowing unlocking their bootloaders, some bootloaders have been hacked by the community. It’s not like this is a static system.

                  I do think Google wants it to be inconvenient enough to run a version of Android they haven’t blessed as one’s main phone that it has no chance to become mainstream, but that’s about the prospect of an OEM not bundling Google’s apps and store, not hobbyists running custom builds.

                  No, Google is also trying to stop hobbyists running custom builds from accessing services built on their software (the aforementioned SafetyNet). Hackers keep finding ways around this, but Google keeps trying to lock them out.

        • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          I can see benefits of such limitations for say a company-owned devices with cyber-security in mind. When we talk about open market of devices in an increasingly “digital” world I am against limitations with profit in mind. It’s like many things in life. When you want to do or use something you have to learn to use it, often by getting burned or otherwise making a mistake. You having to fix family devices has nothing to do with it. Anyway I have no stake in this, I would never buy an Apple device. Companies pushing for “infinite growth” with such policies will be left in the dust imo, but the billionares will just move on after milking everything dry.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a lot of very techy people who’ve never had to do family tech support on this platform.

          Yes, the fact that Mum can’t accidentally install a shitty browser toolbar is a feature.

        • noride@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          “I frequently interface with idiots, so I don’t feel it would be safe for you to have full control over the hardware you own.”

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Nope. No reason that you should pay $1000 for a device and not, at the very least, be able to install compatible software from other sources.

          We wouldn’t accept this from Microsoft. Could you imagine if this was the norm for DOS or Windows?

          Should side loading be discouraged and warned about? Yes. Should it be impossible? Maybe through “parental” controls or MDM, but absolutely not out-of-the-box.

          • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is a sane take, though I personally do generally tend towards understanding and even valuing the walled garden to some degree. But this is what I’ve always felt underneath it, you found the words.

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What’s more, Windows S Mode proved perfectly that you could offer the “safe” functionality that Apple claim they need to protect their customers, without fucking things up for people who wanted to take responsibility for vetting applications themselves.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re missing that you don’t make the OS, and the OS maker doesn’t have to make a way for you to be able to install whatever you want. Sony doesn’t let you install Switch games on your PS5, do they? Should they be forced to?

        • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          No. They can peddle their infinite growth with less people paying more rather than the opposite. This is the way I guess.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Ok so you agree that Sony shouldn’t have to let you install and play anything you want on their console, but Apple needs to be different because…….reasons? Reasons that you can’t articulate.

            • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You missed some sarcasm in there. Once I buy a device, I can wipe it clean, remove any bloat application, load my own code, or side load my friends’ shitty home made game. It’s my device, not apples’. Especially when the device is like 2k€. Apple is responsible for their firmware, so device must run and work for me when I factory reset it. Factory code must be consumer friendly (In reality it’s a tracker and an ad peddler). Loosing guarantee is ok if I phisically modify the device.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                You can try to do all that, sure - but Apple don’t have to enable you to do it, and they damn sure well don’t have to write software specifically so you can do it.

                It’s your hardware, but you bought it with any restrictions they put on it and you’re under no entitlement for them to remove them.

                • middlemanSI@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  You are just describing current landscape of corporate greed. So it’s my expensive device, running their telemetry and being a subject of their forced updates putting more and more restrictions and subscriptions on it’s use while they sell data on the side? All that and I can’t play a shitty but popular game on it? Sounds fun. (sarcasm again…) And no, I will not subscribe to the corporate shill mentality so stop trying.