Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1850arrow-down151
arrow-up1799arrow-down1imageReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square131fedilink
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·4 days agoThey are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
minus-squareLeroyJenkins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·3 days agonot really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoI’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument
They are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
not really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
I’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument