I’m more sympathetic with the (non-profit) board this time. Sam Altman feels like bad news to OpenAI, really. It’s more like the workers rally behind Sam Altman because they can get fat paychecks and bail out once the enshittification intensifies.
Right idea, wrong application. We need this kind of solidarity for the workers. Pretty sure the CEO with hundreds of millions of dollars will be okay.
I feel very stupid but isn’t OpenAI in Microsoft’s portfolio already? What’s really at stake?
I wonder if the board asked ChatGPT if this was a good idea beforehand.
I would even add…
Right idea, wrong application. We need this kind of solidarity for the workers. Pretty sure the CEO with hundreds of millions of dollars will be okay.
They’re not supporting him because they’re worried about his finances. They’re supporting him because they have faith in his leadership. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t care. Lots of CEOs are just empty suits, but Altman clearly has been doing something his workers liked.
Apparently he’s been integral in the whole growth process, I had heard that he personally interviewed most folks that are currently part of the team.
Fuck/Eat the Big Wigs!
Sam Altman is a bigwig.
Surprised they are backing up a sister-fucker.
I’ve seen this in a number of threads but I’ve never seen direct proof?
You can google it. She’s said on numerous occasions and in many many social media posts that he abused her
Everytime smb. says “you can Google it” I think about googling it and expect some weird niche article from some esoteric sites. But then I think, why didn’t you Google it and posted an link? Why should I try to find a trustworthy source for your claim?
- Because you asked
- It’s not my claim
- Because it’s a sensitive topic revolving SA and I feel weird sending the link.
Regardless it doesn’t actually matter. I don’t owe you a link. If you want it I told you how to get it.
You’re willingly confirming something you rate as sensitive, trying to bring more credibility to it by being an extra shout and referencing a virtually unverifiable needle in a haystack ‘authority’ as Google, but find the sensitivity a reason for not sharing your information.
How can you reason like this?
Easily
What I wanted to say is:
If all you have to say “you can google it” then maybe consider being silent.
Nah I’m ok. Thanks for the advice though!
See, here I searched for it in the internet, the earth is flat: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=the+earth+is+flat&ia=news
Even The Guardian confirms it!
This is a garbage method. You can find everything and the opposite too by searching for it on the internet.
I’m not trying to have a debate or prove anything. I’m also not trying for find the most accurate ‘method’ fuck off with their Reddit debatelord shit.
Or, you could just shut up and not say “just google it” anymore. I think that’s the real solution.
Removed by mod
I can also google that the earth is flat
Cool
