Oregon’s first-in-the-nation law that decriminalized the possession of small amounts of heroin, cocaine and other illicit drugs in favor of an emphasis on addiction treatment is facing strong headwinds in the progressive state after an explosion of public drug use fueled by the proliferation of fentanyl and a surge in deaths from opioids, including those of children.

“The inability for people to live their day-to-day life without encountering open-air drug use is so pressing on urban folks’ minds,” said John Horvick, vice president of polling firm DHM Research. “That has very much changed people’s perspective about what they think Measure 110 is.”

When the law was approved by 58% of Oregon voters three years ago, supporters championed Measure 110 as a revolutionary approach that would transform addiction by minimizing penalties for drug use and investing instead in recovery.

But even top Democratic lawmakers who backed the law, which will likely dominate the upcoming legislative session, say they’re now open to revisiting it after the biggest increase in synthetic opioid deaths among states that have reported their numbers.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    We are trying decriminalization, it’s not working.

    The reason it works in Portugal is a) treatment is not optional and b) Nationalized health care.

    Absent those two things, decriminalization is a disaster.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Treatment isn’t mandatory in Portugal. Rather, they expanded treatment services, increased point for positive intervention and interactions with healthcare provider and social workers, and focused on harm reduction.

      Learn about the practices and not the misinformation. You can read more in the wikipedia entry under regulations.

      [T]he suspect is interviewed by a “Commission for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction” (Comissões para a Dissuasão da Toxicodependência – CDT). … The committees have a broad range of sanctions available to them when ruling on the drug use offence. … The committee cannot mandate compulsory treatment, although its orientation is to induce addicts to enter and remain in treatment.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In Oregon, it’s a $100 fine, waived if they seek treatment. The fines are being ignored. Treatment is being ignored. That’s the end of it. There are no hearings, no encouragement, and nothing like this from Portugal:

        https://www.opb.org/article/2023/09/18/oregon-measure-110-portugal/

        "In Portugal, drug users must appear before a commission that determines whether the person needs treatment or should pay a civil penalty.

        “They don’t just assume that everybody will pop into treatment on their own,” Humphreys said.

        And the system includes other measures that don’t exist in Oregon. For example, the commission could suspend the driver’s license of a cab driver until after treatment, he said, giving state officials leverage over users."