Google’s AI may replace traditional websites and content creators leading to potential monopolization and diminishing user experience - Mrwhosetheboss

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        Google: “Well surely, he couldn’t tank TWO massive social media engines in one lifetime!”

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Granted I’m jaded as fuck from only a decade and a half as a software engineer, but from where I’m standing, it’s pretty much all just c-suite circlejerking. Competent, incisive, effective, and ethical c-suite leadership that doesn’t focus primarily on finance matters is vanishingly rare these days.

        • moseschrute@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I’m also a software engineer, but much earlier in my career and mostly having worked at small startups. But I hope some of the tech giants fall and make way for smaller players and innovation. But maybe that’s too optimistic.

  • Flipper@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Maybe because the person that ran yahoo search into the ground is now responsible for Google search.

  • EuCaue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Sometimes I forget that google is a searching engine, I’ve been using DDG for years now! :)

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Thanks for the suggestion. I’ve gotten fed up with trying to work with Google now. I’ve given up

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’ve started getting those AI responses from Google now and I honestly skip right past them.

    I fundamentally don’t trust the information so what’s the point of even reading it?

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yes, but in my experience other search engines still give slightly worse results.

        Kagi seemed good, but don’t wanna pay for it. Or at least not as much as they’re charging.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Startpage gives you the same google results, minus the AI responses.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Most of this AI stuff is trash. I think Google AI has maybe once given me a useful answer. Amazon has this thing called Rufus that just slows down the process of searching customer reviews. Just like Google, it’s maybe once or twice given me useful information and none of it worth the wait that it takes for the search results to come up.

      But we are pouring billions into it and increasing our data center power usage by 10x because It’s The Future …

      • copd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        The problem is AI will always confidently give you an answer like its word is fact. Obviously since you’re the one searching, you’re most likely unable to verify its accuracy so it’s impossible to trust.

        I dont mind AI being wrong when i can immediately tell when its wrong but in searches I’ll never trust it

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          That’s a very good point. Things like chat GPT can accelerate the process of doing something that takes time but a human knows when it’s done correctly. But in anything where finding truth is the goal, it shouldn’t be trusted yet.

  • sheogorath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’ve been experiencing this, but only when I’m not logged in to my Google account. It seems that they’re forcing people to log in so that the search results are less shitty.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Can anyone confirm this? Sounds like something exactly they would do for better data farming. All corps over last few years are offensive with browser tracking bullshit.

      At this rate will demand a camera in your toilet to authenticate you every time you shit to ensure proper ad sense “fingerprint”

  • Imhotep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I just received a Kagi invite from a friend.

    It’s absolutely great

    Let’s hope they don’t look too closely at how family plans are shared for now.
    10€ + taxes a month is just too steep for me

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    For the same reason it became more popular than other search engines in 00s. Those would give honest search results, Google would have various kinds of complex foolery approaching ML to give people what they wanted quicker.

    One can say their corporate culture shows signs of overfitting for that situation. And not just theirs. In general those attempts to make products more competitive with even more complex foolery outside of the main functionality - are that.

    Except when products are simply less usable for said main functionality, people use them less even if they don’t consciously realize that.

    Also - what is Google in essence? It’s saying that some computing thing is too smart for you to run it at home or self-host it. It can only be done by the very smart and important people in companies with trillions in capitalization. And because you can’t, you are by some cultural taboo forbidden, to run it at home or self-host it, they get to manipulate results to make you give money to the people partnering with them.

    We all know there’s nothing fundamentally or practically impossible in making a search engine. If we don’t have to cache pages, it’s actually easy.

    The issue is in the service requirements. What the Internet needs is a technically transparent p2p market of services. Where storage and computing power can be transparently donated (or sold) just like in some countries you can sell power to the electric grid.

    OK, I’ve described the magic wand. That’s the strategy. Tactics is for someone actually capable of conceiving the thing. LOL

    • cybergazer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      When you go to search something and you literally have to type site:reddit.com at the end of it to get a human response it’s no wonder it’s falling apart

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        And reddit is locking shit up as we speak. These corpos about stole 30 years of the internet from us. There is not much recourse either they control pretty much all of the IP and infrastructure. So their way or highway.

        Well there is fediverse for social media at least but it will long time to scale. Other sub sectors will probably need to explore similar models if people want to get away from being gang by 2-3 oligopolies in every market/service they need.