• Sakychu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Camara zooms out revealing a third guy looking down into his face youtube requiring a Webcam so they can track your eyes

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m convinced Mark Zuckerberg had a wet dream about pupil tracking when he bought Oculus.

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    After going nuclear against ad blockers, at some point google is going to introduce a new “feature” where YouTube uses AI with your phone’s camera to automatically pause videos when you look away from your phone.

    Then they’ll make it so you have to buy a subscription to turn it off during ads.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    On Linux or Windows? Firefox + uBlock origin (there’s nothing better than that)

    On Mac? Firefox + uBlock origin (worse alternative: Safari + AdGuard, since you might synch browser with iPhone)

    On Android? Firefox + Privacy Badger + uBlock Origin

    On iOS? Safari + AdGuard + Vinegar + Baking Soda

    On SmartTV it’s different.

    Hardest overall solution: Get yourself a Pi-Hole https://pi-hole.net/

    For WebOS TVs use this: https://github.com/webosbrew/youtube-webos

    Android TVs should get SmartTube: https://github.com/yuliskov/smarttube#smarttube-old-name-smarttubenext

    RokuTVs got either this thing: https://channelstore.roku.com/en-ca/details/840aec36f51bfe6d96cf6db9055a372a/playlet or the open source alternative: https://github.com/iBicha/playlet

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t use an ad blocker anymore but I do pay for a bunch of services and I always pick ad free. I never see ads really.

    If I were to use an ad blocker I would set up a pie hole or similar. I had that before and it worked pretty well but with the server side ads on YouTube you would still see those.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I remember life without adblockers. Back when they were not needed, because web sited did not have ads.

  • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have adblock on my Mac, but not on the PS5. Whenever I watch YouTube on my TV via PS5, I have to open and close videos sometimes 10 or 15 times before they just play the video I’ve clicked on and not some obnoxious 45 second long advert for some bullshit I don’t want and won’t use. Honestly not sure why YouTube finds it so hard to play the video I clicked on and not random other videos. I also tend to stop watching vids as soon as an ad break happens.

    I work with a marketing department full time and they’re exactly as annoying as expected, always pissing about on tiktok or Instagram creating shit that nobody could possibly feasibly care about.

    Is there an alternative to YouTube on PS5 that doesn’t have adverts? Or is there some way to get adblocking on there?

    • Drew Belloc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I believe you would need a pihole, is like a ad block but in the entire network, so you could even use the official youtube app on a tv and not get any ad

      • reddeadhead@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think they serve the ads from the same domain so DNS blocking wont work. And I heard they are testing baking the ads into the actual video.

        • Drew Belloc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I was using the pihole from my pc back in the day and it did work, but i totally forget about the ad injection on the videos

          • kerf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pihole hasn’t made any difference on devices like smart TVs and consoles for years, at least in my experience. It really sucks but they broke me and I bought premium family because we use YouTube a lot on non pc devices and I hate ads so much

  • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If I’m watching YouTube on my TV, I mute it when anything longer than a 5 second ad comes on. If what I’m watching is less than 10 minutes, I’ll just back out and start in again, usually it will come up without the ad, then seek to where I left off. Although oftentimes lately, I’ll be watching a 5 minute video, and I’ll get 1 minute in and get hit with an unskippable 2 minute ad, I just quit YouTube for the day.

  • Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I remembered a scene of a black mirror episode: if the person looked away the ads will stop until the person watch it again and it’s unavoidable … I wonder if this will be a reality one day

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, the technology to do this is here, and they’re just waiting for the consumer to be able to put up with it.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can’t disable the camera without losing functionality then people won’t buy the product.

        If they try to push it by making a gentleman’s agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean the concept is pretty simple, all they have to do is make whatever the content it is not play without the verification.

          Now I do have to say, it does come down to what is the system we do want? We can agree we don’t want intrusive ads. We can say that the paid for services are too expensive. But at the end of the day when we refuse to pay for the content, and then bypass the ads, we do leave content creation in a rough spot. We’ve kind of reached a point where we need a new system. Yet all we seem to do is try and find ways to break the existing one.

          • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The problem is that ad revenue brings in more money than subscription models ever can. So they’re either super expensive because the company is accustomed to the high profits of ads, OR they inevitably end up slipping ads into the paids versions too.

            Youtube has become this venus fly trap where content creators get exploited. They exist on the site solely to draw in viewers to show ads to. YouTube doesn’t really care about the content or their creators(they don’t care about paying them either since there’s endless accounts) their primary function is to sell ads. That’s it.

            With data harvesting and personalized ads they basically print money for themselves. Now each ad spot will show something different to each person, meaning they are getting paid by multiple(potentially hundreds or thousands) of companies for each available ad location. They don’t care if you buy the product because they got paid the second that ad popped up on your screen.

            Ad based revenue is creating a huge fucking mess for everyone.

            • TheFogan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Honestly I disagree… From what I’ve heard from app developers etc… ads generate far less money than even $1 app sales. Now maybe that’s the brokers etc… But there’s also a reason why Hulu shut down their purely ad supported tier, and none of the big companies are leaning into that. Only “subscribe and get ads” lower dollar tiers.

              I’m no super expert, but I think ads are still very inefficiant ways to make money… the profit per customer is very small even with the most privacy invasive blast you away with everything aspect. I don’t claim to be an expert, but it appears to me an ad supported service needs around 100x more users to make the same money as a low cost service. However, in actual userbases it goes closer to 1000x when that offer is on the table.