My takeaway from this is:
- Get a bunch of AI-generated slop and put it in a bunch of individual
.htm
files on my webserver. - When my bot user agent filter is invoked in Nginx, instead of returning
444
and closing the connection, return a random.htm
of AI-generated slop (instead of serving the real content) - Laugh as the LLMs eat their own shit
- ???
- Profit
I might just do this. It would be fun to write a quick python script to automate this so that it keeps going forever. Just have a link that regens junk then have it go to another junk html file forever more.
- Get a bunch of AI-generated slop and put it in a bunch of individual
Inbreeding
What are you doing step-AI?
So now LLM makers actually have to sanitize their datasets? The horror…
I don’t think that’s tractable.
Oh no, it’s very difficult, especially on the scale of LLMs.
That said, we others (those of us who have any amount of respect towards ourselves, our craft, and our fellow human) have been sourcing our data carefully since way before NNs, such as asking the relevant authority for it (ex. asking the post house for images of handwritten destinations).
Is this slow and cumbersome? Oh yes. But it delays the need for over-restrictive laws, just like with RC crafts before drones. And by extension, it allows those who could not source the material they needed through conventional means, or those small new startups with no idea what they were doing, to skim the gray border and still get a small and hopefully usable dataset.
And now, someone had the grand idea to not only scour and scavenge the whole internet with no abandon, but also boast about it. So now everyone gets punished.
At last: don’t get me wrong, laws are good (duh), but less restrictive or incomplete laws can be nice as long as everyone respects each other. I’m excited to see what the future brings in this regard, but I hate the idea that those who facilitated this change likely are the only ones to go free.
Imo this is not a bad thing.
All the big LLM players are staunchly against regulation; this is one of the outcomes of that. So, by all means, please continue building an ouroboros of nonsense. It’ll only make the regulations that eventually get applied to ML stricter and more incisive.
They call this scenario the Habsburg Singularity
It’s the AI analogue of confirmation bias.
AI centipede. Fucking fantastic.
All according to keikaku.
[TL note: keikaku means plan]
So kinda like the human centipede, but with LLMs? The LLMillipede? The AI Centipede? The Enshittipede?
Hahahahaha
AI doing to job of poisoning itself
Anyone old enough to have played with a photocopier as a kid could have told you this was going to happen.
Blinks slowly
But, but, I have a photocopier now…
So then you know what happens when you make a copy of a copy of a copy and so on. Same thing with LLMs.
How many times is this same article going to be written? Model collapse from synthetic data is not a concern at any scale when human data is in the mix. We have entire series of models now trained with mostly synthetic data: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/model_doc/phi3. When using entirely unassisted outputs error accumulates with each generation but this isn’t a concern in any real scenarios.
As the number of articles about this exact subject increases, so does the likelihood of AI only being able to write about this very subject.
This reminds me of the low-background steel problem: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
Interesting read, thanks for sharing.
I always thought this is why the Facebooks and Googles of the world are hoovering up the data now
Well then, here’s an idea for all those starving artists: start a business that makes AND sells human-made art/data to AI companies. Video yourself drawing the rare Pepe or Wojak from scratch as proof.