• 0xtero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d be interested in actually being able to order a Framework laptop.
    Still salty they don’t have anything in Scandinavia (yes, I know. I’ll wait).

  • BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never understood the fixation laptop makers and reviewers have with stiffness. I’d rather have a laptop with some flex to the plastic like those old indestructible toshibas than one that cracks or permanently bends. Everyone who ever used a custom keyboard know that you want some give so why should laptop keyboards be like hammering your fingers on a steel block?

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I dunno, I’d love a case that was strong to prevent lcd and port damage. I’ve lost more fucking laptops to small pieces of plastic like the power plug connector snapping around the port than anything else and I try to take really good care of my shit. Sure a damaged port can be repaired, but the fascia support the plug etc., it’ll never be as strong / reliable as it was and eventually probably fail again. Asus, Gigabyte i7s. A truly strong machined aluminum for would make a great generic footprint/plan for board makers, just transfer your old daily driver into it’s new toughbox. expensive but reusable.

      yeah I’m already in cyberdeck territory shit

      but replaceable hinge mechanisms, configurable port setups, weather proofing, lots of neat shit you could do with an aluminum clamshell

      • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s alright. It has giant bezels, is neither oled nor high refresh. It is color accurate though and has a good resolution. Just wish It’d actually look better.

        • Vik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          High refresh / VRR is a fair shout, since that has the potential to dynamically gear down when idle and save power.

          If desktop displays and TVs are any indicator, OLED was probably skipped on the framework due to cost, power consumption and longevity concerns.

          Just sitting here waiting for microLED to be a thing in consumer electronics :(

          • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m also not super interested in an OLED option but the thing Apple did is pretty great on their MacBook pros

            EDIT: not the notch. The microled or miniled or whatever it is

            • Vik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Neat thing is that they may offer broader display options for both form factors in the future. And if they don’t offer this directly, there’s nothing to say that a third party vendor couldn’t fill this gap.

  • checkfit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Genuine question (don’t have framework yet): What is it now? What’s the advantage of the new?

  • ky56@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe. What I’d like more is a 16:10 display and one or two more built in ports. 4 ports with one being taken by a charger when not using a dock (read dongle) is too restrictive. I would also like to see the dual driver speakers backported from the 16" framework. I like my late-2013 MacBook Pro form factor alot.

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Framework is even taller than 16:10 fyi, and it’s great. Don’t dismiss it before you try it.

      • ky56@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not dismissing it just critiquing. There is a reason I’m still rocking this late-2013 MacBook Pro. Apple MacBook Pro 2016 and onwards are a total showstopper for me for an evolving list of reasons.

        I use my laptop for an almost equal share of movies/tv and general work/programming. So black bars being bigger are potentially annoying. The speaker downgrade is also not great, not that things are great on this machine either. Stupid rubber has disintegrated and the speakers are now worthless.

        However the measly 3 ports on the framework when you using the powersupply is a reason I’m holding off. Given that I understand the architectural limitations, all I’m asking for from framework is two builtin usb-c ports running at 2.0 speeds with PD support. I think there would be room at the back between the rear-most module and the display. This means I can charge from either side and have 5 ports left over. 4 hi-speed ports and 1 usb 2.0. That plus bringing the new dual driver speakers from the new 16" would make me very happy.

        Heck even Apple backpedaled on only 4 usb-c ports in 2020. It’s too low a number of ports.

    • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you mean 16:9? I thought frameworks whole thing with the display was that it’s an extra tall 16:10

  • Ryan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would never say “no” to raw machined aluminium, I definitely like the look, but it’s not really high on my list of priorities when it comes to ordering a laptop (Framework or otherwise). I would definitely consider it if they made it an option.