The case of Christopher Dunn marks the second time Attorney General Andrew Bailey has appealed the swift release of a person whose murder conviction was overturned.
For more than 30 years, Christopher Dunn has been incarcerated in Missouri, accused of a murder he insisted he did not commit. Freedom seemed within his grasp when a circuit judge overturned his conviction and ordered for his release Wednesday — only to be overruled when the state Supreme Court granted the attorney general’s request for a stay.
The legal showdown over Dunn’s release marks the second time in a matter of weeks that Missouri’s Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey has fought a court order to release an inmate who was found to be wrongly convicted.
Last month, Sandra Hemme, 64, the longest-held wrongly incarcerated woman known in the U.S., had her conviction overturned, only to have Bailey appeal her release, keeping her behind bars. Ultimately, she was released July 19 after a judge threatened to hold the attorney general’s office in contempt of court.
A quick Google search on the AG fighting Dunn’s release gives more light to this case.
It turns out Andrew Bailey is in fact a total cockbag, not a partial cockbag but complete and total one. A line from his Wiki:
During his tenure as attorney general, Bailey has adopted hardline conservative positions. He has refused to release prisoners after overturned convictions, attempted unsuccessfully to restrict gender-affirming care, battled initiatives to restore access to abortion in Missouri, and staunchly defended former President Donald Trump over his legal problems.
He appears to just take any hardline right, douchebag, position he can and then almost troll with it.
It’s amazing how the US has allowed so many of these assholes to get into power.
Probably a psychopath/sociopath. Or at least close to it.
It’s amazing how the US has allowed so many of these assholes to get into power.
In our capitalist system the sociopath will always be favored to gain power. They can make decisions without empathy for how it affects people or the long term, decisions of which help propel them to the top of whatever it is they do. This includes bending or breaking the law. Someone who is not a sociopath, more altruistic, more honest, won’t follow the tactics of the sociopath and therefore has less options to gain power and success.
This is how our society is designed and functions, objectively and undeniably. Also arguably it is part of human nature (competition, survival of the fittest) which is what conservatives love at their core. The fact that we try to overcome this with laws and such is difficult and challenging as we can see here. This person should have never got into a position of power, yet he did. How do we restructure society to make sure this doesn’t happen?
That’s most politicians in Missouri and Kansas, they’re just shitty people pandering to the loudest shitty minority. The states are just so gerrymandered it’s not funny. In Missouri specifically all of the population is centered around 3 major areas that are overwhelmingly larger and blue but somehow we go red every single time.
It’s amazing how the US has allowed so many of these assholes to get into power.
It’s amazing how shit some people want to the world to be.
“Cruelty is the point” is one of the most overused (and misused) phrases on the Internet, but it actually seems to apply here. What other reason could there possibly be for the AG and SC to act this way?
Pure fear of admitting mistakes and being held accountable.
“If he goes free, then other falsely convicted black people will clog up the courts with appeals!”
“And then all that free labor will be gone! Won’t someone think of the poor private prison owners?”
Literally what’s happening at Angola with their farm line. The farm makes 8 million a year (at least so says the farm) so they “can’t” shut it down even though prisoners are dying out there in the heat. Free labor is the racist’s drug of choice.
The Missouri judicial system is racist as hell. I can almost guarantee that the person that decided to make those people stay in prison did it because the prisoners were black.
Strangely, it’s not racism. This Attorney General is just notoriously an asshole.
Sandra Hemme, a white woman, was the longest wrongfully incarcerated person, and she recently went through the same issue in Missouri.
I’m sure you’re not wrong about the racism, but his bullshit seems to transcend race.
The answer is almost always incompetence over malice. But as Missourian I can say in this case that there is a heavy dose of both.
BOP (Bureau of Prisons) = Backwards On Purpose
It’s a very simple reason. The Missouri Supreme Court was having a retreat in Ferguson this week. To decide how best to suppress the black vote in November.
Also, fuck all these motherfuckers.
How do you write that article, never mentioning the grounds or reasoning in the AG’s motion?
It should be public record right?
I’m not sure if this is the same case I read about recently, but it was something along the lines of there being some other much more minor conviction and the AG is arguing that the thirty years spent on the wrongful conviction shouldn’t count towards the time given for the other conviction.
I’d suppose the real motivation is hiding from the enormous civil lawsuits that will be coming in.
From a different article, the reason is absolutely ridiculous.
Judge William Hickle agreed at a 2020 evidentiary hearing that a jury would likely find Dunn not guilty based on new evidence, ABC News reported. Hickle did not exonerate Dunn, however, citing the 2016 Missouri Supreme Court ruling from Lincoln v. Cassady that only death row inmates can make an innocence claim.
The solution seems simple. AG Bailey and Judge Hickle both need to be seen engaging in [illegal action they are innocent of] by a sane Missouri Justice System officer and an arrest warrant issued for them.
Only death row inmates…it’s not just that it’s beyond the pale but it’s so stupid while it’s at it I can’t summon words.
Oh, I forgot to include the part from Lincoln v. Cassidy which makes it even worse.
We conclude that Relator would be unable to sustain his burden to establish the procedurally barred claims that he was denied a constitutionally adequate trial, rendering it unnecessary to determine whether Relator has sustained his burden to establish a gateway to review those claims. Because the Missouri Supreme Court has not recognized a freestanding claim of actual innocence in cases where the death penalty has not been imposed, we are not at liberty to expand Missouri habeas jurisprudence to permit consideration of the claim in this case. Accordingly, Relator’s habeas petition is denied.
When you read further into the weeds it gets even worse as there are apparently limitations on whether you can claim innocence depending on whether the trial was “constitutionally adequate” and when issues were raised. Just a bunch of excuses that procedure is more important than justice.
Anyone who knows about Mumia Abu Jamal knows this type of shit is not unique, or even rare.
Or Leonard Peltier. What was likely his final request for parole was just denied.
Yeah it wouldn’t take much to find many examples.
With these headlines you NEVER have to look at the pictures to know this is about a black person /a POC.
So all this, ahem… Freedom©®™ yous claim to have. That doesn’t include actual human rights, does it?
