• Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hyperloop was invented to try to kill light rail. It succeeded at killing Maryland’s new venture and Illinois’. Neither were built because Hyperloop promised bullshit. Elon hates public transport.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The mistake is thinking Elon is a moron screwing everything up on accident. He isn’t. He’s an Afrikaner white supremacist Nazi who is causing all this damage on purpose.

    Starlink and SpaceX should be nationalized before he gets a chance to weaponize those companies against the western world as well.

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          People also like to get places fast. High speed rail does that. Why drive 3-6 hours myself when I can relax and read a book and something for a fraction of that on a train and dodge the headache that is air travel?

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s much easier to build rail in places that weren’t designed around cars. Even in rural China people live in condos and apartments with parks between. This helps with NIMBYism and combined with the already large amount of green space left in Chinese cities such systems can be built with the only real concern being the engineering itself. But China is also in a good position for that, as their workforce is incredibly well educated with more engineering talent than they can even fully employ domestically. All that PLUS the political will of a single party state meant it was a very different situation than California.

    And that’s before you even consider ridership, where even the best possible SF to LA route would still pretty much require you to get a car or taxi once you get to LA (because LA was basically torn down and redesigned for cars).

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Its a lot easier when you have slave labor and don’t care about the enviroment or human lives

  • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is misleadingly reductionist. California high speed rail has made consistant progess in that time. That progress has been slower than ourslowest expectations. It demonstrates the void of expertise the US has in rail megaprojects. However, that expertise is being built, slowly and painfully. Its still forward progress for a nation which tore up half its rail overthe last 50 years.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Giant infrastructure projects are a weakness of democracies. It’s tough to get everyone to agree and pay for huge projects that take long term vision and planning.

    Or you could call it a strength because it’s stable and can’t be changed too fast by one guy with a short term bad idea.

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    China wants unity, even in places where it doesn’t make economic sense.

    edit: 100% downvotes are coming from people that don’t know the situation. The CCP wants fast travel to major population centers even when the rail line isn’t profitable.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It makes economic sense but not financial sense. Railways are almost always profitable once considering second and third order effects.

      It’s the same story with Amtrak, so I’m not sure why people are so confused. Amtrak loses money on every train that’s not the NEC.

  • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    China has the advantage of not having to care about the citizens’ desires in regards to be relocated to make the rail possible.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Kelo v. City of New London. That’s all you need to know about the US’ “care” for citizens’ desires as far as eminent domain is concerned.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US still has things like reelection to consider with these things. China doesnt. And if someone speaks up against the government they just get arrested