Spotify is officially raising its Premium subscription rates in the US come July, following reports of the move in April. The platform is increasing its Individual plan from $11 to $12 monthly and its Duo plan from $15 to $17 monthly — the same jump as last year’s $1 and $2 price hikes, respectively. However, its Family plan is going up by a whopping $3, increasing from $17 to $20 monthly. The only subscribers getting a break are students, who will continue to pay $6 monthly.

Spotify announced the price hikes less than a year after its previous one last July. Before that, Spotify hadn’t raised its fees since launching a decade and a half ago. I guess it was too optimistic to hope the next increase would also take that long, especially with Spotify’s continued focus (and money dump) on audiobooks.

Premium subscribers should receive an email from Spotify in the next month detailing the price hike and providing a link to cancel their plan if they would prefer to do so. Users currently on a trial period for Spotify will get one month at $11 after it ends before being moved up to a $12 monthly fee.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m all for pirating, but tbh music streaming apps are a service that is still in the “worth it” range. Not where Spotify is going, but, maintaining a library of high quality music with all the assets, and serving it to all your devices over the Internet is not a small feat to do securely.

      I’ll probably switch to tidal for now while I start building up my library to include stuff beyond what I like…

      • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You should check out Plexamp while you bridge the gap. It has tidal support built in, and you can self-host your own collection as you build it up. Then when you’re done with tidal, you don’t have to learn or download a new app.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          There is no point to self hosting music streaming in my opinion.

          Just have syncthing sync your music folder on your SD card to your server. Everything local and available when you want it.

          Plex is slowly being enshittified too it seems, just slower.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I do, but the music streaming on jellyfin is nowhere near as nice as plexamp.

              Just syncing all of your files locally is far superior to either unless your library is like >250GB.

              Streaming is a different use case than playing your own music which is essentially what plexamp and jellyamp are doing with extra steps. There are much better local music players than either option.

        • li10@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Done. Until it can’t find a decent quality option for an album you’re searching for.

          A guy I know decided to move away from Spotify and pirate music. The amount of effort he went through means it’s something I’ll probably never try.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            This is the biggest problem for me. I have thousands of movies and 10s of thousands of TV episodes, but my audio library is still all the same stuff I downloaded from Napster, Limewire, Kazaa 20+ years ago. It’s too hard to find a good selection these days outside of a few private trackers. I’m in several private trackers but I’m not going to sit in a queue for 2 days waiting for an interview time and jump through hoops to join something like RED or PTP tier tracker.

            Not to mention I mostly listen to podcasts these days and when I do listen to music, I try to find new stuff that I’ve never heard of rather than searching for a known artist. This would be way too convoluted to do on my own with some self-hosted solution.

            • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’ve been using deemix, and for the most part it’s been pretty seamless. Stuff direct downloads instantly, but it’s all in 128kbps now unfortunately. Then I have lidarr monitor everything for a lossless version.

              • DjMeas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Are you saying Deemix only downloads at 128kbps? If so, I’ve been using it as well and download in FLAC. Also, I pay for the family plan which is $15.99/month.

                Edit: Ah, I’m guessing you’re not on a paid Deezer plan.

                • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah I’m on the free plan which used to include FLAC and 320kpbs, but they stopped doing that for free plans about a year ago I think.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Just some perspective: I’ve been self-hosting stuff for 7y now, started with plex on a nas. I have tried a couple times to get the *arr stack working, one at a time and fuck me it’s complex and the risk of fucking up the config and data crossing the clearnet without a VPN, noooope fuck right off with that. That risk/reward just is too skewed for me.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      As someone else said: it doesn’t replace streaming even a little. Pirating is replacing buying music directly. Streaming facilitates finding new music and trying it out. Being able to listen to anything at any time. You simply can’t do that with downloads; no one can download everything. Piracy in this case really just works for people still listening to their highschool favs and not people looking for new stuff all the time.

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I used to download exclusively when I was younger, but as I get older I’m trying out new genres from different cultures than my own and I’d miss out on it all without a streaming service.

        In my opinion it’s worth it.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes and no. It’s more cumbersome for sure but I used to find music on YouTube and all that back in the day then download it.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I never had trouble finding new music without those recommandation algorithms.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Dear lord no. You can still use Spotify, YTM, and a host of other services to discover new music. The argument was valid back in the days of the excellent Google Play Music, but the algorithm has gone to shit since. There are also tons of sources of user curated playlists you can use to fund new music.

        I am 51 and if I let algorithms pick my music I would never discover most of what I find and constantly be fed thirty year old music. Just this past month I discovered mehro, King Woman, Sugar High and Parra for Cuva.

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It replaces paying for Spotify because its possible to download Spotify premium. Best of both worlds. Use Spotify or YouTube to find stuff, send it to a seedbox, load it later at home.

        Biggest downside is most phones don’t have SD card slots anymore.

        Sent from my (slightly salty) hacked pixel 7

          • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, in fact there are modded versions of the Spotify app (idk about apple) to access their library for free.

            • Neato@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Do they work like ReVanced Youtube and just remove ads/restrictions while keeping account properties? Or do they work like NewPipe and block all the algorithm stuff, use their own accounts/playlists?

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use a cracked Spotify client but if I do legitimately pay, it will be for Tidal. I want that sweet sweet lossless audio people have been talking about.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Spotify locks music is new to me? And for the few Podcasts I personally couldnt care less

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Platform agnostic = you own the mp3/FLACC/ect file, and can play it through whatever client you want

        Platform Locked = you do not own the files, and they are DRM locked to their proprietary media player (see: spotify, kindle, ect)

        Of course there are ways around those locks, but it’s illegal to remove DRM protections (in the us)

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can switch to another service any time you want though.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Idk if I owned as many cds as I’ve spent on music subscriptions I’d own more high fidelity music than I’d know what to do with

                • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  BS. One new CD is at least 10$. A good band collection is then a year worth of subscription fees. So, do you only listen to a few bands?

                  Before Spotify I pirated everything. In lossless, ofc. I had 200GB of music, it wouldn’t fit on my ipod classic, and I still was limited.

                  I pirated at least a lifetime worth of Spotify premium and yet when I switched to Spotify I discovered so many more artists like the ones I already liked. If I now tried to buy all the songs I’ve listened to more than once in the last 5 years, I’d go bankrupt.

                  Spotify is way cheaper.

                  (now add ease of discovering new music, listening to whatever your friends want to listen to in a car, collaborative playlists, etc etc)

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tidal is $11/mo for an individual and $17 for a 6 person family plan. I recently switched because they supposedly give a better cut to artists and serve flac files.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah. Never thought I’d see the day when Tidal was cheaper than crappy Spotify.

        • dinckel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          If i wasn’t paying for a family play on Spotify, I would have resorted to music piracy at this point. The quality is still garbage, the service is getting worse, but the prices are only going up every half a year

          • variants@possumpat.io
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            I tried sourcing my own music but man it’s a lot harder than movies and shows. Especially when you like to hear random recommended music how do you get enough

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah - credit where it’s due, Spotify did a really good job with their music recommendation engine. It’s just that recently, they’ve started to get into the sad part of the enshittification cycle. I kinda saw the writing on the wall when they started forcing Joe Rogan podcast promos fucking everywhere, without having a config anywhere to disable podcast suggestions (which I don’t use through Spotify)

              • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’m surprised you’re only getting these now. My recommendations have been mostly garbage for the better part of a decade so all this praise for finding new music confuses me a little. Spotify has many feats, but the algorithm never was one for me, quite the opposite. I find it more annoying than helpful, actually.

                • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  My beginning (about 6 years ago) was fine. Still miss the radio feature though.
                  They kinda brought it back but in a reverse form (former: 4 new 1 old, now: 5 old 1 new).
                  Playlist shuffle is atrocious but I am not picking them better any better.

            • dinckel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Feel you there. A lot of what i listen to are brand new bands, and finding sources for those is rough

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        £2 a month for a HiFi subscription if you use a Nigerian VPN.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          So if you use a VPN to sign up, then disconnect the VPN, does it block you? Or do you always need to be on VPN?

          • li10@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            You don’t need to be connected on the VPN to use it, I find it identical to my previous UK subscription.

            Only difference is that your initial recommendations are for Nigerian music 😆 Those disappear quite quickly after you start listening to music you like tho.

    • impure9435@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Apple Music only raised the price by $1 since the launch in 2015 (9 years ago). But they added cool features like lossless audio quality and Dolby Atmos. They also had lyrics like 6 years before Spotify added them. I think you can even get it for $6 dollars if you’re a student.

        • GenEcon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          How does this work? Spotify has a deal with the music publishers, where they give 70 % of all subscription income to the music companies. The music companies (Sony, Warner, etc) then split the money based on the share of streams.

          How can Apple pay out 2.5x70 %, so 175 %? Are thes losing with every subscription?

          • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Think of it not in terms of revenue percentages, but by payouts per song stream:

            Service Payout/song Plays to make $1
            Tidal Music $0.01284 78
            Apple Music $0.008 125
            Amazon Music $0.00402 249
            Spotify $0.00318 314
            YouTube Music $0.002 500
            Pandora $0.00133 752
            Deezer $0.0011 909

            So song for song, Apple is paying 2.5x what Spotify is (.008/.00318), and Tidal is paying out a whopping 4x what Spotify pays.

            Sauce: https://producerhive.com/music-marketing-tips/streaming-royalties-breakdown/

            • GenEcon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That whole article is BS, they even say it themselves:

              Rates are rarely paid at a flat rate per stream

              There is no payout per stream. Instead a fixed percentage of the subscription price is shared among each streamed song. So why does Tidal pay more then? Either their subscriber numbers are still incorrect (they have a history of publishing way higher numbers than in reality), their subscriber listen to less music (which is the main reason Apple Music pays more per stream on paper, since its often bundled) or their audience focuses more on a single artist (or a genre).

              • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Sure. Obviously it’s more complex than that, but it helps illustrate where the math came from in the parent comment. I don’t know why Tidal pays more, but I’m hypothesizing its because most of their “co-owners” of Tidal are themselves, artists/musicians, which IMO is significantly better than the out of touch folks running Spotify.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I feel they’re all fairly similar. I won’t do apple music because I don’t do iOS, and I moved from Google play music when forced to the inferior YouTube music. I wonder if tidal or any other service has comparable pricing.

      • impure9435@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve been using Apple Music on Android for years, I definitely recommend it. The app is totally fine, I think it’s still better than Spotify’s crappy app. On desktop you can use the Cider app, which is much better than iTunes. It’s even available on Linux.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I switched to AM a couple years ago due to the (better) privacy policy vs YTM. The app is ‘fine’ but it’s painfully obvious that they didn’t want to bother with the android UI guidelines. But it’s a small annoyance, and the price is… palatable, I guess? I think I’d jump ship at $14, but at $12, fine. I don’t use it that much.

          Actually, it’d be nice if they would charge based on usage, not flat-rate. I doubt I’m using $3 of that $12 cost.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I use YT Music because I get it cheap (VPN shenanigans), you can upload your own music (hello Nintendo soundtracks), and I mod the Android app to stop it being a mess (ReVanced Extended is the GOAT).

        • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do you always have to have the VPN connected to get the cheaper rate?

          • Dasnap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Nah just when I bought it. I did this a while ago so I’m not sure if it still works.

            I’m gonna cling onto the quid a month rate for dear life.

    • cas919@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use Apple Music, primarily because I need to pay for the higher tiers iCloud storage for my wife’s photo addiction and it’s basically “free” for the family plan.

      If I didn’t already have the higher tier iCloud, I would probably prefer tidal for higher quality, or Spotify for the more diverse library.

    • DjMeas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use Deezer’s family plan that includes FLAC/HiFi for $15.99/month.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    More money More crap nobody wants like audio books Still haven’t seen cd quality streaming yet

    I used to happy with Spotify before the enshitificatuon happened…

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have used Spotify’s 15 free hours a month for shorter light novels, but beyond that, buying the rights to listen to a book, or buying more listening hours is very much not worth it through them.

      • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I got Tidal for a month to try it out because I had gotten some XM4s and wanted to check out the 360 Reality Audio tracks, and I was disappointed to find just how few of them there actually are. 😕

        Edit: I see not that they did away with that ultra premium tier and folded those 360 Reality Audio tracks into the regular plans…they really did make it cheaper. Looks like I’m switching back to Tidal.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Well considering the last price hike got us gems like the music 8-ball/magic crystal thing, I can barely wait to see what banger they’ll come up with to bloat my music player with next.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      And removal of much of Spotify curated playlists…
      So mad about that part >:(

      Every “Zusammengestellt für” playlist is a autogenerated playlist and probably not a single human touched that shit. So much less discoverability.

      • Oweneds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I HATE these ‘made for you’ playlists, just repeats of my liked songs and songs it’s always trying to shove down my throat. Some of them barely fit the genre/vibe of the playlist too.

        Part of the original appeal of Spotify for me years ago was the curated playlists.

  • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m all for going sailing but if there are features you want that that can’t quite replicate, it’s also a great time to look at a VPN service with a server in Turkey… Sign up on a Turkish IP and the exchange rate puts you under $2/month USD. This works for a lot of other things too.

  • LCP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t mind paying $10/mo for access to millions of songs on demand, even if the caveat is that I don’t own anything at the end of my subscription.

    I understand costs have gone up, so I can accept a $1 increase in subscription. The problem is that Spotify wants to do a bunch of side projects at my expense. I have no interest in podcasts or audiobooks yet I must fork up the extra money to fund it. I have no say in what my money is being used for and I hate that.

    It’s why I moved from it to Tidal and then to Apple Music (even though I’m on Android). Both have their own issues but at least they’re focused on music.

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The problem is that Spotify is losing money each year. They aren’t profitable. And if they are keep focusing on music, they never will. Their deal with the music labels says that they need to give 70 % of each subscription to the music labels. So by getting more people to signup, they only marginally increase their revenue. Some goes for raising their prices.

      Thats why they tried focusing on Podcasts and Audiobooks. Those are a lot more profitable, either by adding ads (Podcasts) or by charging a premium (audiobooks).

      • Spedwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There is an episode of Tech Won’t Save Us (2024-01-25) discussing how weird the podcasting play was for Spotify. There is essentially no way to monetize podcasts at scale, primarily because podcasts do not have the same degree of platform look-in as other media types.

        Spotify spent the $100 million (or whatever the number was) to get Rogan exclusive, but for essentially every other podcast you can find a free RSS feed with skippable ads. Also their podcast player just outright sucks :/

      • kwirky@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s amazing to think how incompetent their management must be that they’re charging more, delivering lower audio quality, and paying less to artists than competitors like Tidal, yet still aren’t profitable.

        • GenEcon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They pay less than Tidal claims it pays. So far Tidal has a really bad history of publishing correct numbers.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hang on. 70% of the subscription before any royalty / streaming costs?

        So in a $10 payment, $7 is immediately removed, then another say $1 for streaming costs leaving only $2 for profits which Spotify takes 30%?

        From each $10 only $1.40 goes to artists?

        • GenEcon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          From the 10 Dollar, taxes will be deducted. Afterwards Apple or Google take their share (if you subscribe using the App). Of the remaining money the Music labels take 70 %, and Spotify keeps 30 %. The music labels pay a fraction of the 70 % to the artists, depending on the contract and the artist’s share of streams reported by Spotify.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Spotify also has 236 million premium subscribers.
        Let’s assume everyone paying US prices and nobody decides to cancel because of this - both of which are false - that $1 increase would mean Spotify users pay 2.8 billion USD more per year and Spotify gets a cool 850 million.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hope you like Joe Rogan and the crap he peddles because he is getting a nice chunk of Spotify money… I left because of that particular deal

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Any particular reason you went from Tidal to Apple Music? I see a lot of people here recommending it, so I’d be interested to hear any negatives it has.

      • LCP@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The simple reason is because I got a lengthy free trial for it (saving me money on the Tidal sub) and then stuck around.

        Apple Music was hot garbage when I started using it but over the months of my trial it improved tremendously - to a point where there isn’t much difference between it and Tidal. App performance is good now, it provides song recommendations for your playlists, many bugs I was facing have been fixed.

        The Android Auto experience is better for me compared to Tidal, it has Shazam integration (Spotify does too, Tidal doesn’t) and it has many of the Japanese city pop songs I like that Tidal was missing.

        I can always jump ship if needed. Services like Soundiiz and TuneMyMusic make it pretty easy.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ll add the old school method of scrobbling to last.fm for discovery still works pretty well too, and you can play music directly there now using Youtube (probably been there for years I assume). Just found some pretty obscure stuff that isn’t even available on the mainstream streaming services, so that’s a win.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I forgot last.fm existed. I sort of used them years ago.

        They did not handle separate artists with the same name gracefully at all. The page for a riot-grrl adjacent band and an Australian rapper (?) got merged and the fans were going at it on the page.

        Looks like it’s still kind of a problem

  • RinseDrizzle@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bookmarking this page so I can learn modern sailing techniques. Audiophiles who sail the seven seas, please teach me your ways! My most hasn’t hit the surf in a hot minute.

  • Caesium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    I gotta start direct downloading my music again soon. Spotify has just left me feeling so frustrated lately.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve emailed support thrice for intrusive full screen ads. “these are promotions”. Yeah, ads… “Sorry you don’t like our promotions, we will note it”

      Uh huh.