• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I love science, and I’d much rather see billions spent on a collider than war, I gotta admit this is funny as hell.

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its labourers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.

      -Dwight D. Eisenhower

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, if history has taught as nothing else, it’s that the guy with the biggest stick usually wins. There are many criticisms of the U.S. military, but no one could accuse it of being weak. That kind of deterrence is invaluable.

  • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Ok, but what does this collider do, that the one you have in the garage won’t do ?”

    Mrs Cern.

  • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    for context 22 billion is a few billions less than what elon musk overpaid for twitter. i don’t think a bigger collider will do anything but I’d like for humanity to have this rather than whatever the fuck the rich are doing now.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      22 billion is half of what Elon paid for Twitter. He paid 44 billion.

      So this seems like a pretty good bargain for unlocking the secrets of the universe.

      • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        if i remember correctly twitter was evaluated as 20 billion before musk bought it, so he overpaid by 24 billion dollars which is a couple billion dollars more than the price tag quoted here.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah… And at least this will generate jobs… And not reduce them like it did on Xitter.

      • Zarcher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cern has produced quite some interesting systems for software and data management. I am sure the added value of the work is beyond just understanding particles.

    • troglodytis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yep, that was when the US jumped the shark. It was the exact moment, Oct 20, 1993, we went “fuck science, we’re only doing short term profits now.”

  • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is starting to turn into some Full Metal Alchemist shit. If you know, you know.

  • nicoweio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Daily reminder that the World Wide Web was invented at CERN, so somewhere around the LHC highlighted in the picture. Who knows what the next big random innovation will be.

  • xenoclast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If scientists had their way they’d have built the big one first. Or at least something reasonably larger than what they have… it’s politics that is capitalism and war that is the addiction preventing us from having nice things

    • mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the experience of building the previous smaller ones helped though. I think if you just go for the large one, it will probably fail or overrun the budget and we’ll have nothing to show for the money spent.

      • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah you mean unlike the many other wisely spent tax money and private investments which turned out to be something to show for? /s

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Shit Sabine Hossenfelder would say. (She funny tho…)

    Edit: I had no idea about her questionable actions so that is news to me.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ok, that I didn’t know. Off to find some references.

        (I have fairly strong opinions about people like that. Hell, I refuse to watch any Tom Cruise movies because of his association with scientology, just as an example.)

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Is not only about physics research. The complexity of those projects fund hundreds of sectors and push forward new technologies who will have many commercial use.

    …Also they’ve confirmed the existence of this little thing called Higgs Boson which field define pretty much reality, soo… not exactly wasted time.

    • GlenRambo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Awesome. And with reality defined my daily existance and cost of living is. … Exactly the same and killing me. 🙃

      • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There are plenty of natural particles colliders, such as black holes or very dense stars, that are way more powerful than our engineered particle colliders, which (observationally) don’t create black holes around them

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They posit that yes, black holes could be formed, but they’re so small they evaporate pretty much instantly. They don’t have the mass to survive.

    • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, trains!

      Maybe in a very, very large circular track. A huge circle.

      And fast. Super fast. Make them faster by making them lighter. Smaller. Super tiny. So light and fast.

      A teeny, tiny, light train going super duper fast in a very large circle.

      Sure hope it doesn’t smack into anything while going top speed. Or maybe it does, so long as we measure it.

    • nicoweio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s this (true) anecdote that precision measurements at CERN/LHC need to take into account the schedule of high-speed trains in the area because they cause tiny, yet measurable disturbances in the power grid.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There will be.

      Colliders work best at specific speeds, like gears on a car. The big collider is fed by a smaller one. That one is likely fed by an even smaller one. Eventually, you get small enough that a simple linear accelerator can get the gas up to speed.

      Oh, and likely a scientist/engineer grinning manically as they “push the trigger” on the largest rail gun in existence.