• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    they made it online and dont want to bother actually supporting it…

    so we replacing thermostats every decade and a half now?

  • slimarev92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The article (which nobody here bothered to open) says they’ll still function as “dumb” thermostats, so actually it’s less of a big deal.

    • Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The newer Ecobee’s can run entirely locally through their homekit integration. I tie mine into home assistant and use it that way. I would never have bought the device if that wasn’t available.

      If this old version doesn’t have that available then I’m assuming people purchased it knowing that it was reliant on cloud services. It would be nice if they offered customers options besides just letting the device turn into e-waste but you can understand why they don’t want to burn development hours on a device that’s a decade and a half old.

      Just another reason to never buy devices that can’t function without a cloud service.

  • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thermostats are easy to change out. So this isn’t a huge deal. But I don’t love the idea that tech isn’t built to be self-hosted or maintained in any meaningful way. If you’re not shipping an open source version of your software when you close up, you’re an asshole.

    Yeah, self hosting isn’t for most lay people if it’s just a GitHub repo. But GitHub repos quickly become adopted by nerds like me who build tooling around it that eventually let lay people self host software with the click of a button.

    • wagesj45@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Newer versions are Homekit compatible and can be controlled over the local network.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Home assistant can talk to homekit devices without involving Apple, so you can assume it’ll be around for a while.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, 100%. Home assistant can basically connect to any damn thing. Home assistant is going to be the fall back for a lot of legacy iot devices and platforms.

  • philpo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s why one uses an industry standard that is brand-independent,operates offline by design and does not require a central component besides a power supply.

    Sounds like utopia?

    This standard has been available since 1990 in its archaic form, since 2002 in its current form. It is downwards compatible and over 400 companies worldwide are part of the standard. HomeAssistant, ioBroker, openHAB,etc. all support it directly and there are multiple crossover gateways with other standards like DMX, ModBus, Dali,etc. exist. And no, it’s components are not more expensive once you look at the TCO.

    For fucks sake, people, use KNX.

    (PS: There are even a few open-source/DIY components available)

    • philpo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And to add another unpopular opinion:

      A smart temperature control is the one I never ever need to use. Because then the room always has the temperature I want.

      • CucumberFetish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you have a home office or someone is at home 24/7, then yes. Otherwise it would make sense to reduce the heating/cooling of the house when no one is home and setting the correct temp again when people are about to get back. Saves quite a few bucks.

        • philpo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The system does exactly that - But that is done automatically without intervention.

          The system recognises by checking on our devices and the presence detectors if we are at home. If we aren’t it reduces the temperature.* Then it looks into our calendars when we can be expected to be back and increases the temperature accordingly (additionally once we enter a certain Geofence).

          *:The overall heating effort is also based on the current and expected weather and sun-influx,as I have some rooms that basically heat themselves when the sun is out. The system is using that effort to adjust shades (e.g. it would allow a lower living room temperature in the morning after we left when it knows that there will likely be a sunny afternoon heating the room without the need to add external heat)

          This is what I mean with smart: A smart system is only smart if the user doesn’t have to fiddle around with it. Everything else is a remote.

          (My next goal is to add personalised heating. I want the system to recognise who is/comes home and adjust the temperature accordingly as my wife wants other temperatures as I do. O can do it room based, e.g. the kid’s room is adjusted according to the kid being there, but overall I am not quite there yet)

          • CucumberFetish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ah, sorry, I misread your comment. I understood it as you’ll never need a smart temp control as a static temperature is always correct.

  • Antergo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AA much hate this might be getting, they’re offering discounts on a new product, and 16 years is a hell of a lifetime. Imagine having to support software written in c99 maybe even c89, with some homebrew UI full of bugs.

    • AnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a thermostat.

      I’m coming from a field where supporting software written in the 70s is the norm.

      Your argument is horribly short-sighted and wasteful.

      Only 16 years old is extremely recent software that ought to be easily maintained in any sane world.

      • Antergo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I understand you may be from a field where supporting software from the 70s is required, however someone is probably paying big bucks for that software as well. Replacing the software you work on might cost millions, replacing a thermostat costs 300 usd.

        I would love to live in a world where software support lasts 70 years. But consumers don’t look at software support, so it’s not budgeted in the price, and thus doesn’t happen in the consumer space. Getting 16 years in a consumer device is long.

        In the field you’re working, stability, longevity, and robustenes is probably a requirement, not a nice to have.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      and 16 years is a hell of a lifetime

      Think about it like this: Even if the average home nowadays had only about 10 such devices (I am quite sure the average home has a lot more), that are needed for kitchen appliances, heating, warm water, window shutters, solar panels, etc to function - that means on average about once a year one of the essential functions in the house stops working unless you replace a part. Not because it’s broken, but because “SW support is discontinued”. Seriously, I want to smash everyones faces for those “early adopters” who think smart homes are great, and of course the companies who put software in every little component.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m in my house right now with a perfectly working thermostat that’s 70 years old.

      And given the mechanism of action it will continue working in another 70 years.

      16 years for hardware used inside of homes is a ridiculously, absurdly, short lifetime. Even for a vehicle that would be pushing the edge of “too short”.

      That said 16-year-old software is not that old. If it’s built using sane language choices it should actually be functioning and modern today.

      • bier@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That is true, but my smart TV and smart scale both got something like 5 years of updates. Who buys a new scale every 5 years? My parents still have a scale from the 90s that works fine.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Every time somebody steps on the scale, it identifies who they are, it logs their weight, body fat percentage etc puts it into an app for historical viewing

      • slimarev92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The article says that offline functions will continue to work. So they’ll just become regular thermostats.

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The company is offering affected users a 30 percent discount on a new Ecobee thermostat, valid for up to 15 thermostats.