• [email protected]@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Isn’t it obvious, Joe?

    “While I condemn Hamas, and supported Israel’s right to defend itself in the aftermath of the attacks, the use of force in reprisal has become excessive - beyond what is justified or acceptable. So effective immediately, I’m halting all arms shipments to Israel, and calling on President Netanyahu to withdraw IDF troops from Gaza and the West Bank.”

    Problem solved.

  • arglebargle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Four colleges simply met with their protestors, came to an agreement to not invest in companies supporting the war, and publicly call for peaceful resolution.

    Why is it so damn hard for all the other ones?

    • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      came to an agreement to not invest in companies supporting the war

      No, they came to an agreement to listen to a proposal to maybe not invest in those companies.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        No it isn’t.

        Presenting independently verifiable facts in a way that bolsters your perspective is not the same as making up stories and using entirely false data to incite your listeners.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Not the ones I’ve spoken to.

            Conservatives won’t usually meet a challenging topic head on, they try to avoid and misdirect from rather than address an issue.

            It boils down to a fundamental difference in perspective and ultimately behavior.

            When conservatives are presented with information, even completely made up stories, that agree with their preconceived notions, they accept the story regardless of the logic or substance of the story. Once information that disagrees with their preconceived notions arises, they reject the story regardless of the logic or substance because it isn’t something they’ve learned before.

            When liberals are presented with information, they accept or reject the story based on the available substantiated information and how it fits into what they have learned so far.

            This is the process behind what fundamentally makes a “conservative” and a “liberal”.

            Conservatives are inherently afraid of challenges to their worldview and as a result, resist change simply for the sake of protecting themselves as long as possible.

            Liberals are also inherently afraid of challenges to their worldview, but persist in discovering the truth and apply what they’ve learned to their behavior because of the benefits that context, understanding and new knowledge might bring about.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re cracking down harder on these protesters than the January 6th insurrectionists lol.

    • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Trump was in charge on J6. The failure to crack down then, is in part due to Trump intentionally not cracking down. I would compare this to the heavy handed crackdown on the DC Black Lives Matter protesters. You know, the one where he heals a Bible upside down. That was a violent crackdown on mostly peaceful protestors.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Fair points.

        Side note just in case it saves you from a gotcha in arguing with a Maga nutjob, but Trump didn’t hold the Bible upside down that day, per NYT, Politifact, and other fact checkers. He’s still a useless piece of shit.