• Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Guys this is an enterprise feature. I hate windows as much as the next guy but y’all should actually read the article. Its not forced upon anyone.

  • fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    To gain the most security value from ZTDNS, system admins will need to enumerate the expected domains and/or IP ranges they expect their clients to connect to,” Jake Williams wrote. “Failure to do so will result in self-inflicted denial of service.”

    Glad I’m on Linux/macos at home/work. Wtf is happening.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Self-inflicted”. If you don’t comply, we’ll break your computer, and that’s your fault. Why did you make us do that???

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “protective DNS”

    There is no way there isn’t a hidden agenda. You already could block malicious websites at the browser level

    • plz1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      With the shady path they’ve been on lately, I wouldn’t be surprised if they locked down the home editions to only using their servers, so they can use the data points/telemetry to sell ads, etc.