• HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’ve clearly never lived with a cat. Your metaphor is crushed by the Kitty Expansion Theory: No piece of furniture is large enough for a cat and any other additional being.

    • kaboom36@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The kitty expansion theory is incomplete, any piece of furniture is large enough for both a cat and an additional being provided the additional being was there first

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        horrible take IMO. firefox is using 12GB for me right now, but you have no idea how many or what kind of tabs either of us have, which makes all the difference to the point your comment has no value whatsoever.

        • puppy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          How come it has no value? I used to run Chrome but now I run Firefox. My browsing habits have not changed yet the memory consumption has greatly improved. It may not have any value to you but it certainly was a valuable experience for me and I made the comment hoping that it might find someone who is in the same situation as I was. I’ve got nothing to prove and nothing to gain. Anyone may run their own experiment.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    My 2010 arm board with 256MB ram running openmediavault and minidlna for music streaming. Still lots of RAM left.

  • Ravenson@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    As somebody with a System76 laptop, I’m feeling personally attacked.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Just like the human eye can only register 60fps and no more, your computer can only register 4gb of RAM and no more. Anything more than that is just marketing.

    Fucking /S since you clowns can’t tell.

    • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Jokes on you, because i looked into this once. I don’t know the exact ms the light-sensitive rods in human eyes need to refresh the chemical anymore but it resulted in about 70 fps, so about 13 ms i guess (the color-sensitive cones are far slower). But psycho-optical effects can drive that number up to 100 fps in LCD displays. Though it looks like you can train yourself with certain computer tasks to follow movements with your eye, being far more sensible to flickering.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not about training, eye tracking is just that much more sensitive to pixels jumping

        You can immediately see choppy movement when you look around in a 1st person view game. Or if it’s an RTS you can see the trail behind your mouse anyway

        I can see this choppiness at 280 FPS. The only way to get rid of it is to turn on strobing, but that comes with double images at certain parts of the screen

        Just give me a 480 FPS OLED with black frame insertion already, FFS

        • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, i do not follow movements (jump to the target) with my eyes and see no difference between 30 and 60 FPS, run comfortably Ark Survival on my iGPU at 20 FPS. And i’m still pretty good in shooters.

          Yeah, it’s bad that our current tech stack doesn’t allow to just change image where change happens.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s not sarcasm, it’s misinformation. Not surprising that people downvoted you even though it was just a joke.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Now snap some pics of this kitty laying in different places all over this couch; you now have a new meme: Address Space Layout Randomization.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just wait till all the browser tabs sit down, and need to swap to the floor.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    About 10 years ago I was like “FINE, clearly 512MB of memory isn’t enough to avoid swapping hell, I’ll get 1 GB of extra memory.” …and that was that!

    These days I’m like “4 GB on a single board computer? Oh that’s fine. You may need that much to run a browser. And who’s going to run a browser regularly on a SBC? …oh I’ve done it a lot of times and it’s… fine.”

    The thing I learned is that you can run a whole bunch of SHIT HOT server software on a system with less than a gigabyte of memory. The moment you run a web browser? FUCK ALL THAT.

    And that’s basically what I found out long ago. I had a laptop that had like 32 megs of memory. Could be a perfectly productive person with that. Emacs. Darcs. SSH over a weird USB Wi-Fi dongle. But running a web browser? Can’t do Firefox. Opera kinda worked. Wouldn’t work nowadays, no. But Emacs probably still would.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If that picture was of a Windows installation, Windows would be a Sumo Wrestler instead of a kitten.

    • judas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I use both Fedora (daily driver) and Windows 11 Pro (gaming), and Windows doesn’t use much more RAM honestly. Fedora uses currently 10.5 GB of RAM with Firefox, Spotify, Plex, and Telegram running (looks like a couple of YouTube tabs in Firefox are having a party here with 1 GB of used RAM for three tabs…), and Windows is typically only 1-2 GB above this with the same type of usage. I have never maxed out my 32 GB of RAM on either OSs.

      • You have a lot of ram, linux will try to use most of it, it’s a normal thing. There’s a huge difference from using a large amount of ram when available to NEEDING that amount to run.Try installing both OSes on a machine with 4gb, and see the difference between them. One will be usable, while the other will have a poor performance. You can even push it harder with a 1gb machine. Linux will provide a system with basic functionality, while windows will be unusable.

  • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Transcoding an HDR blueray to h265 filled it up pretty quick and I’m about to start dabbling with game development/3d modeling.

    I’ve also filled it up pretty quick learning how fast various data structures are in which situations. You don’t really see a difference in speed until you get into the billions of items at least for python.