RIP. I hope the levels were backed up.

    • Vincent Adultman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      'member when we were able to self host servers of our games? I member. CoD4 was awesome because of that, later the pirated version of MW2 too. These games (the first MW and MW2) are still alive because of that.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cod WAW has user servers but they stopped paying for their anti cheat so vanilla servers either block you or are fudged

        Plutonium fixes this

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Not quite as important as the right to repair, but close in spirit: I would love to see a legal requirement for shut-down online games to release the server specs needed for the community to replace/maintain them.

    Edit: And data export for existing players, so our game progress can be reconstructed on community servers, of course.

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        shutting down most central servers is a death sentence anyway. I’m not putting another decade of grinding into a private server when my Diablo 3 characters are gone.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yeah… For battle royal and extraction shooters I think it would also be pretty hard to come close to the experience on private servers.

          Granted, I wouldn’t mind being able to play e.g. Hunt Showdown with some friends on a private server/in a private match. It wouldn’t be what it is today, but it could still be fun.

          It’s not like games with large populations are really getting shut down anyways. The games that are killed are already dead for most people. I really only am bothered by it when it’s a clearly single player/offline friendly game.

          • metaStatic@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            BRs never caught my interest but I always assumed they where a clean slate each game, which is actually the perfect kind of game for private servers.

        • MisterChief@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Agreed. But not impossible. Insignia got original Halo 2 Xbox Live servers back online. Most nights you can find a game easily with 20-40 people online during peak hours. It requires a soft mod and maybe 1-2 hours of set up to get online. If anyone could just turn on their old Xbox and play, I’m confident those numbers would be in the hundreds at least.

          Allowing people to run private servers is an easy way to allow those that want to play to keep playing in an era where most games have some level of online functionality.

          • kratoz29@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            It requires a soft mod and maybe 1-2 hours of set up to get online.

            My Xbox 360 is gathering dust because, unlike all my other consoles, I am not able to mod it myself :/ (softmod).

            I did not know the original Xbox had a softmod though.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        honestly copyright law shouldn’t apply to games that are no longer fully playable for any reason

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’ve found that most people on this site don’t care about copyright in any form, so they’ll just ignore it like everything else

            • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well, when companies are cutting off people’s purchases and wiping works from our cultural history, a little bit of disregard for the law that is complicit with it is pretty much necessary.

              Say, it’s through copyright violation that we can still play games from Mario Maker 1 even though the servers were shut down. People figured out how to copy it even though they weren’t allowed to.

              If this is wrong, maybe the law should be fixed to provide a proper path.

    • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is not enough, the code is old with vulnerabilities that will be exploited with automation nowadays. To correctly do this you need open source server code, or to have it maintained.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is not enough, the code is old with vulnerabilities

        You have misunderstood. I am not talking about continuing to run the old server binaries.

  • MrRawRats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    7 months ago

    I really hope that governments, especially the EU, recognise the isse server shutdowns and games being lost to history poses. It should be illegal for companies to make your already purchased games unplayable if not community hosted alternatives exist.

    On that note it should also be fully legal to emulate and freely distribute any game that isn’t on sale anymore. Years of cultural history are being destroyed for corporate profit.

    • Moghul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t really expect a business to be forced to run a game in perpetuity, but at least they shouldn’t be allowed to C&D you from doing it if they aren’t.

      • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They would never have such expectation if they simply allowed players to host it to begin with. This used to be the norm, until companies figured out that it’s easier to control, monetize and force obsolescence to push players into a newer product if they are the only ones hosting servers.

        • Moghul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m a developer. It’s work to do anything, code doesn’t grow on the LLM tree yet. That’s a feature that would have to be implemented. Anything you ask the business to put effort in is a negative to the cause (and the cause is good), something for the businesses to latch onto to stop the law from changing.

          The best argument you can make is ‘let us figure it out, just don’t sue us’. Anything else you get is a blessing.

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s work to do anything, but we routinely see small indie studios managing to release player-hosted games just fine, while large studios don’t bother. Even though it also costs them more to run all the servers on their own. So I’m not so sure it’s just a matter of saving costs.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree. Hell, older games could be put on digital stores right now. The PS3 had a ton of PS1 emulated classics, and even then there were a bunch left off for unknown (or licensing) reason.

  • PotatoKat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re playing on ps3 or emulation you can play online using lbpunion.com they’re currently looking into ps4 support, but just know that it requires CFW.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      We “all helped” as in people in charge gave us no choice and we didn’t choose the choices we didn’t have.

      Hell, even then there’s still people fighting to preserve and host games on their own regardless.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sounds like they tried to patch some security vulnerabilities and it broke something so catastrophic that they would need do to a major re-write.

    Does this also break the single player portion?

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Never played it, but this news is always sad, hopefully the community is in the works of archiving this, of already did.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shame there wasn’t more notice. I’m sure the community would have tried to do something.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t trust them as a company. They basically gave up on dreams even though it was actually a moderately successful product.

    But they became really obsessed with their vision of what the product should be rather than adding the content that the player base wanted.